Giza
 44/45

 aG2sw x S1 = 44° S1 x aG2sw = 45°

 a circle, with a radius of 1500 cubits (3000 diameter) centered on G2sw (-844, -811) and another circle, radius 280 cubits (560 diameter) centered on G1 center point (0, 0) intersect at a whole number round integer point from G1 center coordinates (198, 198) ...exactly at the first larger circle's 44° mark, and the second smaller circle's 45° mark...
 so, the G2sw corner does not have a 44° angular relationship to the G1ne corner
 what the G2sw corner has a 44° angular relationship to is S1, the sphere of G1, radius 280, based on G1 height

 ...and then i stumbled upon noticing... an interesting coincidental intersection ...this same 1500 cubit arc from G2sw ...just happens to cross... the LL line... (120 S of G1south, 340 S of G1 center) ...right at 555 cubits east of G1 center ...which, 555 is an interesting number it's important in the positioning of G3 in the squaring of the circle geometry and then rotating the whole thing 45°
 ```( -844 , -881 ) ( 555 , -340 ) ( -144.5 , -610.5 ) 1500 cubits -21.142° -21.14° 2 and 3 of 7 it might be 21.142114... send that one to a math guy ```

 ```...so, i went n did some math n i don't know where to begin i'm beginning to suspect the builders did not use base 10 numbers... first or... put another way... did not think of numbers in base 10 as a priority though 10 is apparently ...a common demoniator but, just one of many ```
 ```so, now, i'm curious as to how these numbers are expressed... or represented digitally... in binary, hex, etc... n alotta this is inherent to the numbers themselves hence the existence of sacred geometry conceptually but it's reflected in the geometry of the giza site ```
 ```anyways... i'll jus ...lay all these... ...puzzle pieces... out on the table... read it if you like ...it stopped making sense to me so i just cleaned it up a little threw it in here, then unplugged ...just trust me... it's beyond bizarre ```
 ```G1 volume and the square root of 5... here's an example of how they line up... in our numbering system, watch repeaters... G1v / root 5 = 8,080,851.52828723999086323241564 G1v / root 5 = 8,080,851.52828724...^^.(^^) .......................72 36 G1v x root 5 = 40,404,257.64143619995431616207819 G1v x root 5 = 40,404,257.6414362...^^.(^^) and i'm making little pyramids with my shift-6 :P ...here's their average... 24,242,554.58486171997258969724692... ...and then... i went... quite mad... juggling even numbers at me like that ```
 ```elsewhere there's the relationship between 4 and 15 4/15 = 0.266 15/4 = 3.75 16 fourths = 4 this is one less ...(2x2) - 1/(2x2) 1/4 from 4 squared ...15/4 = 3.75... ...reciprocal... 4/15 = 0.266... times 100, it's two 13s and 2/3... one and one third fifths or, four fifths of a third 3 and 5... straddle... 4... (15/4) - (4/15) = 3.4833... 3.4833... - pi = 0.34174... ```
 ```. pi = 3.14159... sq/5 = 2.236... two = 2 sq/3 = 1.732... phi = 1.618... 3/2 = 1.5 sq/2 = 1.414... ```
 ```pi = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795 /5 = 2.2360679774997896964091736687313 /3 = 1.7320508075688772935274463415059 phi = (sq/5)/2 + (1/2) phi = 1.6180339887498948482045868343656... phi = one half + half the square root of 5 so... two phi = one + the square root of 5 ```
 ```much like how sq/5 (2.236...) straddles 2 and sq/3 (1.732...) and sq/3 (1.732...) with phi (1.618...) and sq/2 (1.414...) their averages: sq/5 (2.236...) and sq/3 (1.732...) = 1.9840593925343334949683100051186 very close to 2 ...2 hundredths ```
 ```the square root of 5... /5 = 2.2360679774997896964091736687313 the square root of 3... /3 = 1.7320508075688772935274463415059 now, add them together ++ = 3.9681187850686669899366200102371 almost 4, or 2 squared )4 = 0.0318812149313330100633799897628 .... 0.0314159265358979323846 (pi/100) .... 0.00031415926535897932 (pi/10000) .... 0.000003141592653589 (pi/1000000) ```
 ```you see where this is going continually adding (pi/100) gets closer and closer to 4 but, will never quite touch... it's the mathematical expression of: a curve coming in adjacent to a line which is exactly what's going on with... all the spheres, circles, pyramids n lines ...and ok... silly... kid stuff... yeah... ```
 ```now, let's look at 100: 10 x 10 = (2x5) x (2x5) 4 x 25 = (2x2) x (5x5) and what's missing from its reflection of 1: 99 99 (9x10) = (3x3)x(2x5) (11x9), straddling 10 and... 1 short of 100 so... infinite repeat ...curve on a line... ```
 ```that's what these numbers are expressing... these proportions, especially, significantly ```
 ```sq/5 (2.236...) + sq/3 (1.732...) = 3.968... 3.968... / 10 = 0.3968... 0.039681187850686669899366200102371 4.0077999729193536598359862103395 ....so, the sum of root 3 and root 5 ..stagger back n forth, straddling 4 incrementally smaller, into infinity so: they also define a gradual curve 100 pi (314.159...) -0.34073464102067615373566167204971 /5 - /2 = 0.82185441512669464760748494452158 /5 - /3 = 0.5040171699309124028817273272254 /3 - /2 = 0.31783724519578224472575761729617 /5 + /3 = 3.968... = 4 - 0.03188... (/5)/2 = 1.118... ```
 ```so, there's just an incredible amount of stuff goin on here ...and it's all... interconnected, somehow... apparently... and there's a lot of... circles and angles i want to get to ```
 ```...like this diagram... pointing to: other pyramid sites in the vicinity: associated with and corresponding to different stars around Orion's Belt: ```
 ```...the larger purple circle (above) ...shows the SW corner of G2 (center) equidistant from NE corner of G1... hmmm and the front or head area of the Sphinx but, it doesn't indicate the measurement ```
 ```also, in the image above, the larger purple circle... on closer inspection, is not centered exactly on G2sw ...and, i don't know if that's intentional, or not... it seems like it's just meant to be a rough depiction as: while the smaller purple circle seems to indicate its center point is where the G1s line meets G3w line a quick look at the coords map, that radius is: 877.5 ...which seems like an odd number to me, right now... (though i do like the line from G3se to G1se corners) also, i havn't even put the sphinx into the model yet (don't have coordinates for it, i'll get to it later) first i'll see what i can come up with on the big one just in the general area o the northeast corner of G1 ```
 ```the 3D image (below) shows the NE corner of G1 (half transparent) and an arc, drawn from from G2sw at 1500c (circle diameter 3000c) intersecting the NE edge of S1 and well within the cut-out corner ...G1cNE... (so named for: G1 cut-out pyramid, north-east corner) (the green squared rod is the north perimeter, adjacent G1 north) ```
 ```note: you can't really do lines in this program what i've done here: is create 2 separate rings (red and purple) each 1/2 cubit wide (1c total) (4 cylinders in 2 pairs: positive and negative) ...the actual distance... of 1500c from G2sw... ...is where the inner and outer circles meet... so now we have an accurate line... between them ```
 ```...now, of course, you can probaby draw... ...just about any kind of circle you want... (and there's many diagrams with similar circles) but these are all very round, harmonious numbers (remembering that: 440+60=500, hinted at earlier) and while it's not apparent in the wide scale map ...that G1 and G2 do not line up... exactly at 45° they don't really have to and on closer inspection: ...that's not what they're lining up to, actually ...but on the wider scale... it might as well be ...so, while i'm not disputing what it's showing ...the virtual model requires precision accuracy ```
 ```...and this is where i found something really amazing... ```
 (click pic for hi-rez)
 ```...not sure... what the... proper geometrical term is for this partucular kind of conjunction or alignment... ```
 ```S1 (the sphere of G1) at 45° intersects: arc aG2sw at 44° ...280c from S1/G1 center... is 1500c from G2sw corner... ```
 ```here, i've made a hi-rez image with captions and insets and added alot of other objects, to clarify positioning and found a few other curious alignments in the process ...all of which, i'm sure only scratches the surface... ```

 ```a tight overhead zoom view (below) on the intersect point: (198, 198) ```
 ```this is the NE edge of S1 (inside G1) at 45° just where S1 intersects G1 at 45° (no arc) ```
 ```transparent overhead composite (above) the "yellow dot" is a reference marker for coordinates (198,198)... and shows the NE extension of S1 at ground level intersects point (198,198) from center ```
 ```...zooming back a bit (below) the 1500 cubit arc from G2sw aG2sw-1500 (purple and red) intersects the yellow dot at the same coordinates ```

 (click pic for hi-rez)
 ```wide overhead view showing the entire NE corner of G1 ```
 ```here i've added the angle lines as emanating outward from G2sw 43° = yellow line upper left 44° = white line mid center 45° = yellow line lower right ```
 ```our yellow dot, G1ne198 (center of image) as reference point (198,198) of G1 center is also intersected... by the white line radiating: at 44° clockwise... from G2sw ```
 ```the mystery of the G1-G2 offset is solved (or, part of the confusion is cleared up) ```
 ```...the arc and sphere intersect exactly... ...one degree counter-clockwise from 45... at ground level, as this is the disc of S1 ```
 ```also... 22 cubits south and 22 cubits west of the NE corner of G1 at coords (220,220) ...noting that (440/22=20) and (220/22=10) and 22 x root 2 (1.414...) = 31.112698.... ...and the 11:7 ratios... 22/7 being pi... ```
 ```white dot marks the NE extension of the 1500 arc ...at coordinates: 216.66 east, and 179.66 north ```
 ```zoom in on the NE corner of G1 (below) the G1ne reference marker (green square) is 2 cubits (and made half-transparent) at coordinates: (220,220) from G1 center white line is 44° radial from G2sw corner ```
 ```...here, i've added a yellow line ...0.1 cubits thick (east to west) and 3 cubits long (north to south) ```
 ```showing specifically where the 44° G2sw angle enters and exits the 2 cubit square, for G1ne (which is perhaps interesting enough as well) ```
 ```...the green and white lines are each set to 0.2 cubits thick: and i've converted the white tube to a rectangular box (below) to show the angle comes closest to intersecting G1ne at 44.02° and the G1ne corner (center of the green square) is (220, 220) ```
 ```almost... i can't get any more accurate than this ...but i suspect the actual angle of intersection is probably an additional single minute of arc... (one 60th of a degree) (three 180ths of a degree) putting the angle at 44.0166667° (or five 300ths) ```

 ```...here's the whole scene again... this time north is up in all views ```
 (click pic for hi-rez)
 ```basically the same information... added a couple more dots... i also noticed that arc aG2sw1500 intersects LL at (555, -340) 555 figures prominently in the dimensions and positioning of G3 such as "G2w-G3w" plus the length of a G3 side... (353.5+201.5) ...yet another conspicuous numerical concidence to keep in mind ```

 ```...while i'm throwing down new dots... just to check their positions... ...i thought i'd measure the distance between degree points on aG2sw... ```
 ```purple dot = aG2sw 43° = (179.00, 216.00) cube 1 43-44 midpoint = (188.50, 207.00) 43.50° yellow dot = aG2sw 44° = (198.00, 198.00) cube 9 44-45 midpoint = (207,33, 188.83) 44.50° white dot = aG2sw 45° = (216.66, 179.66) ```
 ```...at this resolution... decimal accuracy is insufficient... ...i can't divide an incremental postion by an even third... but that's not reflective of the design just the limits of the program no surprises, anyways ```
 ```and then i noticed something... that was just what i was keeping an eye out for ...(i just happened to be using 2 cubit diameter discs to measure) ...vesica... ```
 ```...intentional or not... ...the relative positions... between the blue and white dot and the geometry of the vesica adhere to a 3 cubit measurment at the 45° ray of aG2sw for S1 (3 cubits; 45° squares root 2) this same relationship is also between the blue and green dot which, while not exactly on S1 forms a double square with the white dot: dubbed G2sw1500ne45 ```
 ```...of course... the white and green dots don't share the same vesica relationship as do the green-blue and blue-white dots ```
 ```...even when projected outward: ...to 3 cubit diameters each... i'm sure there's something here but i'm not just going to guess ```
 ```the point is... those are... 2 valid points or dots on the design plan... and their positions are proportional to a vesica relationship at 3 cubits ```
 ```here, i've rotated the image 45° clockwise (rather than the vesica diagram overlay) ```

 Giza
 44/45
 « prev « Cutout Corners » next » Orion