Astra
Giza
OCT 3



Measuring With Lines



here's Jim Alison's pic, again...
with nice neat little proportions
...make a model of these squares:
check his math a little bit first
assuming that's a 45 angle
start with a line from G1nw
meet with another from G3sw
extending from line to G3se
but which corners exactly ?
...see, G3 is rotated 0.28
either one is close enough,
...i guess whichever one...
...is closer to whatever...
...will be my favorite...
i'll start with the "model"
straight, un-rotated one...
the first one divide into 3
but the second into 2 fours
...and now... a 3rd line...
with proportions of 10 n 11
and this axis: at G2 center
...well, we'll see...
what those numbers be









this page is under construction








measuring lines: from SC's diagram
of his geometrical plotting of OCT
...here, i rotated his image 180
to bring it closer to a NSEW view
...the yellow line
is his L1 (roughly)
from G3ne, through G2
(and close to corners)
...to G1 center but...
continuing on to G1ne
the red line is:
G1a-NE to G3a-SW
closely touching
G1se and G2se...
the upper blue line looks like it's
intersecting the following points:
G1e and G1s... G2e and G2s
G3ne and G3sw... G3c-ne, G3c-sw
now, not all of those are going to be exact
but, i'll try to see how close i can get...
Scott Creighton:
the (red) SE line connects
all three sets of 3 pyramids
i estimate, that the length
...is around 2238 cubits...
...divide this 2238 by the
length of the G1 440 = 5.086
G1 encodes Pi (3.14) x
G3 encodes Phi (1.62) = 5.086
...so, Pi x Phi (5.086) may be...
the underlying unit of measurement
...upon which the cubit was based
measuring G1aNE-G3aSW...
from the NE corner of G1a
to the SW corner of G3a
G1a coords: ( 373 , -64 )
 at 95 cubits square
 95 / 2 = 47.5
373 + 47.5 = 420.5
-64 + 47.5 = -16.5
G1aNE: ( 420.5 , -16.5 )
G3a ( -1088.75 , -1596 )
 at 84 cubits square
 84 / 2 = 42
-1088.75 - 42 = -1130.75
-1596 - 42 = -1638
G3aSW: ( -1130.75 , -1638 )
measuring the hypotenuse
for that right triangle
 1130.75 + 420.5 = 1551.25
 ... 1638 - 16.5 = 1621.5
(1551.25)2 + (1621.5)2 = C2
A2   2,406,376.5625
B2 + 2,629,262.25
C2 = 5,035,638.8125
and the square root of that
   = 2244.022908...
just 6 cubits off that target 2238
but they're at different elevations
(someone get me those numbers)
...what is the altitude difference ?
...also, 6 cubits (almost exactly)...
though a nice round number (hex)
...is well within my margin of error
measuring pixels off the satellite









closeup overhead of G3nw corner...
with SC's OCT lines roughly placed
... L1 (yellow) ... L2 (green) ...
red square is the NW corner of G3
still searching for SC's L1...
but, the first thing i did is:
measure a line from G1 to G3nw
... G1 ( 0.00 , 0.00 )
G3nw ( -1197.50 , -1310.50 )
... cp ( -598.75 , -655.25 )
and, i'll do it that way if i have to,
(as that is the center of that circle)
but, in this case, it's easier to just
...center an object at G1 center (0,0)
(so that line will extend far NE also)
...and ending at...
...the red square...
the distance between
G1 center and G3nw
is exactly 1774.5
L1 at 42.42 intersects G3nw:
so, 42 degrees (360th circle)
and 42 hundredths of a degree
= to 25.20 minutes exactly...
that's interesting, because...
the line between G1sw and G2ne
measures 328.5 cubits at 40.42
(same 42 hundredths of a degree)
...right image...
overhead wireframe
composite zoom of G2ne
i also noticed L1 passes
almost right through G2ne
...well, ok... not exactly...
the same point where it
passes through G2 E side
point-X ( -433 , -473.85 )
...G2ne ( -433 , -470.00 )
is almost 4 cubits (3.85)
south of the G2ne corner
a line from there to G1sw
G1sw ( -220 , -220.00 )
...measures 40 exactly
...one 9th of a circle
...or a 3rd of a 3rd
...at 331.35 cubits
331.35 from 333 is 1.65
and that times 3 = 4.95
but, say i'm off a hair
...which is most likely
5 over 3 is 1.6666.....
...or, put very simply
...five... thirds...
...so i'm gonna say...
that 1.65 is just 5/3
(but i'll accept 1.60)
extending that line to 333
and the box for the point
now rotated to match 40
made 1.6 cubits square
...the edges touch...
blue line = G1sw-G2ne
yellow dot = G2ne
gray line = G2ne-sw
brown area = G2 base
yellow line = SC's L1
green line = 40 angle X
extended to 333 cubits
figuring for angle X
( -220   , -220    )
( -433   , -473.85 )
   213     -253.85
   106.5   -126.925
( -326.5 , -346.925 )
clear white turned box is
the point of intersection
L1 (G1-G3sw) meets G2
center of box
is angle X at
331.35 cubits
...these numbers definitely...
...have something in common...
(thus they're not an accident)
again, G1sw-G2ne (blue line) is 40.42
...and angle X (green line) is 40.00
the short side, connecting (upper G2e)
is a total 3.85 cubits, point to point
sine of 3.85 is
0.067144621099...
2/3 of a tenth...
(they're artists)
it is the position of egyptology
that there is no special geometry
involved with the pyramids of giza
except the most very basic of things
associated with pyramids, generally
therefore, anything anybody finds
or thinks they're possibly finding
is obviously pure imagination
...and the more involved...
the more we're ranting

because of where the idea goes
that it couldn't possibly have been
any of their favorite ancient kings
who developed the vast designs
or even conceived these things

and i don't know about any of that
and i'm not out to rewrite history
but, of course there's
alignments everywhere
that's obviously the way it was designed
whoever could have pulled off such a thing

but if they're not willing to accept
that which is easily plainly shown
seriously
get a map
and a triangle
and do your own
the simplest implications
are only further glorifying
their glorious histories
impressive national pride
then they must be certain otherwise
that where that logic track is going
that this means their story is false
such things
must prove
eventually
they're wrong
in what they say
...they must be so sure...
something more, so impressive
that it couldn't possibly have been
who they're insisting it is (period)
even ridiculously unreasonably
all along, and unquestionably
inconsolably
...hyper-actively...
casually dismissively
of everything presented
to the potential contrary

...and zooming in on G3nw...
white line is L1 (center G1)
green line is L2 (center G3)
yellow square is G3nw proper
(in this case, dubbed G3nw1)
but, G3 is rotated 0.28 so,
red square is G3nw actual...
(in this case, dubbed G3nw2)
...G3nw1 and G3nw2 are at an
approximate 45 relationship
to each other... (red square
arcing on axis of G3 center)
measuring a line: from G3nw1 to G3nw2
(the centers of red and yellow boxes)
...to determine angle and distance...
G3nw1 ( -1197.5  , -1310.5  )
  ... ( -1197.25 , -1310.25 )
G3nw2 ( -1197.0  , -1310    )
the line between
is the angle of a
half cubit square
root 2 times 0.5
= 0.7071067811...
(the sine of 45)














figuring for line G1se-G3se
G1se = (  220.00 ,  -220.00 )
G3se = ( -996.00 , -1512.00 )
 diff .. 1216 ..... 1292
 half ... 608 ...... 646
midpt. ( -388    ,  -866    )
is 1774.25 cubits, at 43.264
43 15.84' ... 43 15' 50.4"
passes just barely SE of G2se
which is coords: (-433, -881)
coords for G2 center
( -638.50 ,-675.50 )
side for G2 being 411
C2, the circle for G2
411 x root 2 = 581.25
(581.241774135342...)
581.25 cubit diameter
290.625 cubit radius
extending that circle to 626.20
...brings it right in line with
the line from G1se to G3se ...
C2a
313.1 radius
626.2 diameter
...centered on G2se
the object for the line
from there to point A
measures 45 cubits...
...and yes, exactly...
and of course at 45
therefore, line AG = 22.5
22.5 is 16th of a circle
a cubit degree correlation
A ( -417.1   , -896.9  ) = C2a x
B ( -433     , -913.8  ) = G2e x
C ( -402.125 , -881    ) = G2s x
D ( -428.67  , -907.75 ) = C2a-1
E ( -394     , -870.93 ) = C2a-2
F ( -417.8   , -896.2  ) = C2a-3
G ( -433     , -881    ) = G2se
click pic
for hi-rez
and here, notice where the curve from the wide arc of C2a (brown)
enters and exits, overlapping onto the line for G1se-G3se (green)
i wonder what the proportions are for this thin crescent (yellow)
it seems to me they should remain the same
no matter how thick i make that green line
just proportionally (that angle, that arc)
...C2a is intersecting the line at 45
but, because the line itself isn't 45
(just shy of that... at about 43.264)
...it is further south than it is east
it's pulling away from 45 at 46.736
a difference of 1.736 from 45
a difference of 0.014 from 1.75
reminds me of root 2 (1.414...)
now, point A is not exactly
between point B and point C
because the line on which they're based
...G1se-G3se... is... roughly... 43.26
so, now i have to do 3 different objects
...but before i figure their coordinates
i duplicated the object for the dot point A
converted it to a cube, centered on point A
...then zoomed in on the object for point C
...and then adjusted the object's length...
until it met the center of point C at 43.66
...divide that in half... 43.66 / 2 = 21.83
...therefore, line AC is 21.83 cubits
so, half of... 1/3 short of 44 cubits
1/6th cubit from 22
...asking me nicely
to draw a hex, here
(yeah... somewhere)
repeating the same trick
...to figure for line AB...
zooming in on point B...
adjusting object's length
until it meets the center
...of point B at... 46.4
and half of that is 23.2
...so that's the line AB
and using the same pair of tricks
for the line from point D to E...
...centered on point F...
same approximated degrees
reaching point D center
the line object is 31.7
...thus, line DF = 15.85
and repeating process
zooming in on point E
object length = 69.42
half of that is 34.71
and that's my line EF
adding those together
15.85 + 34.71 = 50.56
for length of line DE
centered somewhere in there
but i'm interested in ratio
15.85 DF
+ 34.71 EF
= 50.56 DE
15.85 / 4 = 3.9625
and 34.71 / 3.9625
= 8.75962145110...
...or roughly 19/4
and also 8 and 3/4
15.85 / 34.71
= 0.456640...
34.71 / 15.85
2.18990536...
...divided by 5
DF > 15, so > 3
EF < 35, so < 7
15.85 / 50.56 = 0.31348892405063291139240506329114...
34.71 / 50.56 = 0.68651107594936708860759493670886...














this page is under construction











...and continuing on with the investigation...
Astra
Giza
OCT 3
prev
OCT 2
next
OCT 4